..............................
..............................
..............................
A New Approach for A Domain-Independent Turkish Sentiment Seed Lexicon Compilation
Sentiment analysis deals with opinions in documents and relies on sentiment lexicons; however, Turkish is one of
the poorest languages in regard to having such ready-to-use sentiment lexicons. In this article, we propose a domain-
independent Turkish sentiment seed lexicon, which is extended from an initial seed lexicon, consisting of 62 positive/negative
seeds. The lexicon is completed by using the beam search method to propagate the sentiment values of initial seeds by
exploiting synonym and antonym relations in the Turkish Semantic Relations Dataset. Consequently, the proposed method
assigned 94 words as positive sentiments and 95 words as negative sentiments. To test the correctness of the sentiment seeds
and their values the first sense, the total sum and weighted sum algorithms, which are based on SentiWordNet and SenticNet 3,
are used. According to the weighted sum, experimental results indicate that the beam search algorithm is a good alternative to
automatic construction of a domain-independent sentiment seed lexicon.
[1] Abdul-Mageed M., Diab M., and Korayem M., “Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis of Modern 6 W D Q G D U G $ U D E L F ´ in Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: Shortpapers, Portland, pp. 587- 591, 2011.
[2] Araya I. and Riff M., “A Beam Search Approach to the Container Loading Problem,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 43, pp. 100-107, 2014.
[3] Baccianella S., Esuli A., and Sebastiani F., “SentiWordNet 3.0: An Enhanced Lexical Resource for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Valletta, pp. 2200-2204, 2010.
[4] Banea C., Mihalcea R., and Wiebe J., “A Bootstrapping Method for Building Subjectivity Lexicons for Languages with Scarce Resources,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Marrakech, pp. 2764-2767, 2008.
[5] Bautista J., Pereira J., and Adenso-Diaz B., “A Beam Search Approach for the Optimization Version of the Car Sequencing Problem,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 159, no. 1, pp. 233- 244, 2008.
[6] Bennell J. and Song X., “A Beam Search Implementation for the Irregular Shape Packing Problem,” Journal of Heuristics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 167-188, 2010.
[7] Blum C., “Beam-ACO-Hybridizing Ant Colony Optimization with Beam Search: An Application to Open Shop Scheduling,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1565- 1591, 2005.
[8] Brooke J., Tofiloski M., and Taboada M., “Cross- Linguistic Sentiment Analysis: from English to Spanish,” in Proceedings of International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, Borovets, pp. 50-54, 2009.
[9] Cakmak O., Kazemzadeh A., Yildirim S., and Narayanan S., “Using Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic to Analyze Turkish Emotion Words,” in Proceedings of Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference, Hollywood, pp. 1-4, 2012.
[10] Cambria E., Havasi C., and Hussain A., “SenticNet 2: A Semantic and Affective Resource for Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis,” in Proceedings of the 25th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, Palo Alto, pp. 202-207, 2012.
[11] Cambria E., Olsher D., and Rajagopal D., “SenticNet 3: A Common and Common-Sense Knowledge Base for Cognition-Driven Sentiment Analysis,” in Proceedings of the 28th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Québec City, pp. 1515-1521, 2014.
[12] Clematide S. and Klenner M., “Evaluation and Extension of a Polarity Lexicon for German,” in Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis, Portugal, pp. 7-13, 2010.
[13] Cruz F., Troyano J., Pontes B., and Ortega F., “Building Layered, Multilingual Sentiment Lexicons At Synset and Lemma Levels,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 13, pp. 5984-5994, 2014.
[14] Das A. and Bandyopadhyay S., “SentiWordNet I R U , Q G L D Q / D Q J X D J H V ´ in Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Asian Language Resources, Beijing, pp. 56-63, 2010.
[15] De Albornoz J., Plaza L., and Gervás P., “Sentisense: An Easily Scalable Concept-Based Affective Lexicon for Sentiment Analysis,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Istanbul, pp. 3562-3567, 2012.
[16] Dehkharghani R., Saygın Y., Yanıkoğlu B., and Oflazer K., Language Resources and Evaluation, Springer-Netherlands, pp. 1-19, 2015.
[17] Demirtaş E., Cross-Lingual Sentiment Analysis with Machine Translation, Master’s Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2013.
[18] Ding X., Liu B., and Yu P., “A Holistic Lexicon-Based Approach to Opinion Mining,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, Palo Alto, pp. 231-240, 2008.
[19] Duyu T., Bing Q., LanJun Z., KamFai W., YanYan Z., and Ting L., “Domain-Specific Sentiment Word Extraction by Seed Expansion and Pattern Generation,” Retrieved September 1, 852 The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 16, No. 5, September 2019 2015 from http://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.6722v1.pdf, Last Visited, 2013.
[20] Esuli A. and Sebastiani F., “Determining the Semantic Orientation of Terms Through Gloss Classification,” in Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Bremen, pp. 617-624, 2005.
[21] Esuli A. and Sebastiani F., “SENTIWORDNET: A Publicly Available Lexical Resource for Opinion Mining,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Genoa, pp. 417-422, 2006.
[22] Fellbaum C., WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, MA: MIT Press, 1998.
[23] Hu M. and Liu B., “Mining and Summarizing &