..............................
..............................
..............................
Application of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Evaluation Method in Aircraft Cockpit Display Ergonomics
The ergonomic level of cockpit display design can be improved by establishing an objective and effective method for
evaluating the ergonomics of the cockpit display. Given the fuzz problem in ergonomic evaluation, a new intuitionistic fuzzy
evaluation method is proposed based on the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ordered Weighted Geometric Average (IFOWGA) operator
and the possible degree function in this work. Firstly, the intuitionistic fuzzy evaluation matrix considering the hesitation
degree of experts' determination is first constructed as the basis of intuitionistic fuzzy evaluation. Secondly, using the IFOWGA
operator the intuitionistic fuzzy evaluation values are obtained through aggregating the evaluation matrix. And these values
are ranked to get the level of ergonomic evaluation by possible degree ranking function. Finally, an evaluation example based
on the cockpit display of a certain aircraft is given to verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Six alternatives of the
evaluation result are obtained by the aggregation of the IFOWGA operator. Applied the possible degree function, the
ergonomic evaluation grade of the aircraft cockpit display is the second level by ranking the alternative sand the variation of
intuitionistic fuzzy value is already small when the number of experts is more than 16. It can be shown from the results that the
ergonomic level of cockpit display can be objectively and scientifically evaluated by the proposed quantitative method, and it
can provide a theoretical basis and practical methods for improving the ergonomic level of cockpit display design.
[1] Alvarez J. and Mercado P., “Online Inference of The Dynamic Security Level of Power Systems Using Fuzzy Techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 717-726, 2007.
[2] Atanassov K., “Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87-96, 1986.
[3] Bustince H. and Burillo P., “Vague Sets are Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 403-405, 1996.
[4] Chaji A., Fukuyama H., and Shiraz R., “Selecting A Model for Generating OWA Operator Weights in MAGDM Problems by Maximum Entropy Membership Function,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 124, pp. 370-378, 2018.
[5] Chen D. and Zhang L., “Intuitionistic Fuzzy Identification of Air Attack Target Type,” Control and Decision, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1046-1049, 2011.
[6] Craig J. and Burrett G., “The Design of A Human Factors Questionnaire for Cockpit Assessment,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Human Interfaces in Control Rooms, Cockpits and Command Centres, Bath, pp. 16-20, 2002.
[7] Cui M., Sun Y., Yang J., and Weinan W., “Power Grid Security Comprehensive Assessment Based on Multi Level Grey Area Relational Analysis,” Power System Technology, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 345 3-3460, 2013.
[8] Dahiya N., Bhatnagar V., and Singh M., “A Fuzzy Based Matrix Methodology for Evaluation and Ranking of Data Warehouse Conceptual Models Metrics,” The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 202-212, 2018.
[9] Das S., Kar S., and Pal T., “Robust Decision Making using Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers,” Granular Computing, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41-54, 2017.
[10] Devi K. and Yadav S., “A Multicriteria Intuitionistic Fuzzy Group Decision Making for Plant Location Selection with ELECTRE Method,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 66, no. 9-12, pp. 1219-1229, 2013.
[11] Garg H. and Kumar K., “Improved Possibility Degree Method for Ranking Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers and their Application in Multiattribute Decision-Making,” Granular Computing, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 237-247, 2018.
[12] Geng T., Zhang A., and Lu G., “Consensus Intuitionistic Fuzzy Group Decision-Making Method for Aircraft Cockpit Display and Control System Evaluation,” Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 634-641, 2013.
[13] Guo Z., Guo D., Yang J., and Huang C., “Study on Evaluation Index System of Helicopter Display Interface Ergonomics,” Electronics Optics and Control, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 68-69, 2011.
[14] Havir T., Durbin D., Frederick L., and Hicks J., “Human Factors Assessment of the UH-60M Crew Station during the Limited User Test,” Technical Report, 2006.
[15] He Y., Chen H., Zhou L., Liu J., and Tao Z., “Intuitionistic Fuzzy Geometric Interaction Averaging Operators and their Application to Multi-Criteria Decision Making,” Information Sciences, vol. 259, no. 3, pp. 142-159, 2014.
[16] Li L., Yao J., Long L., Yuan X., and Li H., “Application of Combination Weighing Method in Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation of Power Quality,” Automation of Electric Power Systems, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 56-60, 2007.
[17] Li Y., Yuan X., and Yang F., “Multilevel Fuzzy Evaluation of the Cockpit Ergonomics,” China Safety Science Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 51, 2003.
[18] Liao J., “Mental workload and its Measurement,” Journal of System Engineering, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1192-1231, 1995.
[19] Liu F., Pedrycz W., and Liu X., “Flexibility Degree of Fuzzy Numbers and its Implication to a Group-Decision-Making Model,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 5, no. 27, pp. 1-12, 2018.
[20] Liu H., Tu J., and Sun C., “Improved Possibility Degree Method for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi- Attribute Decision Making and Application in Aircraft Cockpit Display Ergonomic Evaluation,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 202540-202554, 2020.
[21] Liu X., “Task-oriented Indicator System for Human Factor Assessment of Fighter Cockpit,” Mechanical Engineer, vol. 6, pp. 88-90, 2018.
[22] Maldonado-Macías A., Alvarado A., García J., and Balderrama C., “Intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS for Ergonomic Compatibility Evaluation of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 70, no. 9-12, pp. 2283-2292, 2014.
[23] Mao A. and He J., “An Approach of Power Grid Security Comprehensive Assessment Based on Credibility Theory,” Power System Protection and Control, vol. 39, no. 18, pp. 80-87, 2011.
[24] Tan C. and Chen X., “Generalized Archimedean Intuitionistic Fuzzy Averaging Aggregation Operators and their Application to Multicriteria Decision-Making,” International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, vol. 15, no. 02, pp. 311-352, 2016.
[25] Wang H., Wu G., and Liu B., “Brief Analysis of Aircraft Cockpit Display/Control System Application of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Evaluation Method in Aircraft Cockpit ... 863 Design,” Technology and Innovation, vol. 5, pp. 15-16, 2016.
[26] Wang Q., Wen F., Liu M., and Yi S., “Combined Use of Fuzzy Set Theory and Analytic Hierarchy Process for Comprehensive Assessment of Electricity Markets,” Automation of Electric Power Systems, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 32-37, 2009.
[27] Xu P., Yang S., Li F., and Feng S., “Power Grid Security Index Calculation and Display Method Based on AHP and Variable Weight Mechanism,” Automation of Electric Power Systems, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 133-140, 2015.
[28] Xu Z. and Yager R., “Some Geometric Aggregation Operators Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets,” International Journal of General Systems, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 417-433, 2006.
[29] Xue Y. and Fu G., “Statistical Analysis of the Action Path of Unsafe Act Causes in General Aviation Accidents,” Safety and Environmental Engineering, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 131, 2018.
[30] Yager R., “Prioritized Aggregation Operators,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 263-274, 2008.
[31] Zadeh L., “Fuzzy Sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, pp. 338-353, 1965.
[32] Zhao H., Xu Z., and Liu S., “Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Information Aggregation with Einstein T-Conorm and T-Norm,” Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 240-264, 2017.
[33] Zhou L., Tao Z., and Chen H., “Continuous Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators and their Applications to Group Decision Making,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 38, no. 7-8, pp. 2190-2205, 2014. Hui Liu received the B.S. and the M.S. degrees in Communication and Information System from the University of Kongjun Engineering, China, in 1999 and 2003, and the Ph.D. degree in communication and information system from Kongjun Engineering University in 2006. He is also a Lecture in electronic engineering at information and engineering school for Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang, China. His research interestsare in the fields of avonics, intuitionistic fuzzy set theory and ergonomics evaluation. Chengli Sun received the B.S. degree in electronics engineering from Zhongbei University, Taiyuan, China, in 1999, and the Ph.D. degree in signal and information processing from Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunication, Beijing, China. He is currently a Professor with Information Technology School, Nanchang Hangkong University, China. His current research interests include biomedical image analysis, image processing, speech recognition, speech enhancement, and acoustic event detection. Jiliang Tu received the Master degree of systems engineering from Harbin University of Science and Technology in 2005, Heilongjiang, China and he completed his research Ph.D. of traffic Information Engineering & Control in Tongji University in 2013, China. He is currently working as an associate Professor (Senior Grade) at School of information and engineering, Nanchang Hangkong University, China. His research is focusing on system engineering theory and practice, equipment supportability theory.