Abstract

References

[1] Cazzola W. and Marchetto A., AOP1Hidden Metrics: Separation, Extensibility and Adaptability in SW Measurement, Journal of Object Technology , vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 53168, 2008.

[2] Chidamber S. and Kemerer C., Towards A Metrics Suite for Object Oriented Design, in Proceedings of the 6 th Annual Conference on Object$Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications , Arizona, USA. pp. 1971211, 1991.

[3] Filman R. and Friedman P., Aspect1Oriented Programming is Quantification and Obliviousness, in Proceedings of Workshop on Advanced Separation of Concerns , Minnesota, USA, 2000.

[4] Haupt M. and Mezini M., Micro1Measurements for Dynamic Aspect1Oriented Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science , vol. 3263, pp. 81196, 2004.

[5] Kuljit K. and Hardeep S., An Investigation of Design Level Class Cohesion Metrics, the International Arab Journal of Information Technology , vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 66173, 2012.

[6] Poshyvanyk D. and Marcus A., The Conceptual Coupling Metrics for Object1Oriented Systems, in Proceedings of the 22 nd IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 4691478, 2006.

[7] Przybylek A., An Empirical Assessment of the Impact of Aspect1Oriented Programming on Software Modularity, in Proceedings of International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering , Athens, Greece, pp. 1391148, 2010.

[8] Rachel B., Fabiano F., Alessandro G., and Francois T., An Empirical Evaluation of Coupling Metrics on Aspect1Oriented Programs, in Proceedings of the ICDSE Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Metrics , Cape Town, South Africa. pp. 53158, 2010.

[9] Rachel B., Fabiano F., Alessandro G., and Francois T., Coupling Metrics for Aspect1 Oriented Programming: A systematic Review of Maintainability Studies, in Proceedings of the 4 th International Conference on the Evaluation of Novel Approaches in Software Engineering , Italy , pp. 2771290, 2010.

[10] Steimann F., The Paradoxical Success of Aspect1Oriented Programming, in Proceedings of the 21 st Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object$Oriented Programming Languages, Systems and Applications , Portland, USA, pp. 4811497, 2006.

[11] Subramanian N. and Chung L., Metrics for Software Adaptability , available at: www.utdallas.edu/~chung/ftp/sqm.pdf, last visited 1999.

[12] Suganthi S. and Nadarajan R., Middleware Model for Adapting Dynamic Requirements, Journal of Digital Information Management , vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 20129, 2012.

[13] Tarvainen P., Adaptability Evaluation at Software Architectural Level, Open Software Engineering Journal , vol. 2, pp.1130, 2008.

[14] Wampler D., Aspect1Oriented Design Principles: Lessons from Object1Oriented Design, in Proceedings of the 6 th International Conference on Aspect$Oriented Software Development , Vancouver, pp. 1110, 2007.

[15] Zakaria A. and Hosny H., Metrics for Aspect1 Oriented Software Design, in Proceedings of the 6 th Workshop on Aspect$Oriented Modeling with UML , San Francisco, California, USA, pp. 116, 2003. Subbian Suganthi recived her Bs degree in 1991 at PSG College of Arts and Science, Bharathiar University, India; and MSc in 1993, MPhil in 1994 at PSG College of Technology, Bharathiar University, India. she is pursuing her PhD degree. in Faculty of Science and Humanities, Anna University, India. Currently, she is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Technology and Applications, Coimbatore Institute of Technology, India. Her research interest is in the area of software architecture, design patterns, component technology and object1oriented analysis and design. 694 The International Arab Journal of Information Techn ology, Vol. 12, No. 6A, 2015 Rethanaswamy Nadarajan is the Professor and Head of the Department of Applied Mathematics and Computational Sciences, PSG College of Technology, India. His research areas include object1oriented computing, software engineering, data mining and database management systems. He published many research papers in International Referred Journals.